Decision ·
Bar on the RAW ratio; every publication shows raw + floor-removed + above-always-decline side by side
From the record
- Context
- Author's morning decisions: bar on the raw ratio, but always publish raw + floor-removed + above-decline side by side
- Why
- rubric floor gives a blank system ~0.20–0.31
- What followed
- headline later switched to floor-adjusted while raw stays the formal rule
- Reversible
- yes
- Status
- superseded by D-036 · Floor-adjusted ratio + win/tie/loss became the headline on 2026-10-06 (applied 2026-10-07); the raw rule is still printed as the formal rule.
- Alternatives considered
- lead with floor-adjusted
- Floor-adjusted only
Linked facts · 2
- Bar judged on raw ratio; raw + floor-removed always shown side by side — why: Author ruling — outcome: Superseded in emphasis by D-process-08Bar judged on raw ratio; raw + floor-removed always shown side by side — why: Author ruling — outcome: Superseded in emphasis by D-process-08Date2026-10-02Kinda record, not a measurement (set, status, judge, n, seeds: not recorded)Sourcenot in the public repositories yetOpen the data file
- Bar on the RAW ratio; every publication shows raw + floor-removed + above-always-decline side by side — why: rubric floor gives a blank system ~0.20–0.31 — outcome: headline later switched to floor-adjusted while raw sta…Bar on the RAW ratio; every publication shows raw + floor-removed + above-always-decline side by side — why: rubric floor gives a blank system ~0.20–0.31 — outcome: headline later switched to floor-adjusted (D-chron-early-21) while raw stays the formal ruleDate2026-10-02 ~11:15Kinda record, not a measurement (set, status, judge, n, seeds: not recorded)Sourcenot in the public repositories yetOpen the data file