# Headline = floor-adjusted ratio + win/tie/loss (+ share of items ≥ 3/5), raw second; own bar = floor-adj ≥ 0.50 on V-para

> Living preprint · as of 2026-10-25 · map node D-036 (decision) · interim record, not a final result.

<!-- lint:exempt:start -->
- [D-036] 2026-10-06 · Headline = floor-adjusted ratio + win/tie/loss (+ share of items ≥ 3/5), raw second; own bar = floor-adj ≥ 0.50 on V-para · why: raw 0.50 is ~61 % free because of the rubric floor. · status: kept

<!-- lint:exempt:end -->
## Outgoing

- uses: [G-floor-adjusted] floor-adjusted ratio (floor-adjusted + win-rate lead) → https://r4topunk.github.io/boar-research/map/g-floor-adjusted.md

## Incoming

- led to: [F-003] A system that declines every question already scores about 0.31 on the raw ratio, because the rubric never… (declining everything already scored ≈ 0.31 raw) → https://r4topunk.github.io/boar-research/map/f-003.md
- led to: [D-011] Bar on the RAW ratio; every publication shows raw + floor-removed + above-always-decline side by side (superseded) → https://r4topunk.github.io/boar-research/map/d-011.md
- led to: [D-021] Primary metric = raw ratio, bar > 0.50 (the author's decision on 2026-10-02, not the app maintainer's) (superseded) → https://r4topunk.github.io/boar-research/map/d-021.md

Read chapter 16, Where it stands (live): https://r4topunk.github.io/boar-research/research/honest-number.md

## Facts cited {#facts}

Resolve every [F-…] marker in https://r4topunk.github.io/boar-research/data/facts.json. Each line gives the claim, the number with its metric family, set and status, judge, n, seeds, CI, date and caveat.

<!-- lint:exempt:start -->
- [F-1146] Headline = floor-adjusted ratio + win/tie/loss; raw second — why: Always-decline system scores raw ≈ 0.31 for free — outcome: Outside critic: post-hoc but toward the stricter scale, "not self-serving" · date 2026-10-06
- [F-1226] Headline = floor-adjusted ratio + win/tie/loss (+ share of items ≥ 3/5), raw second; own bar = floor-adj ≥ 0.50 on V-para — why: raw 0.50 is ~61 % free because of the rubric floor — outcome: board and claim draft rewritten 10-06 22:40. · date 2026-10-06
- [F-1227] Headline = floor-adjusted ratio + win/tie/loss (+ share useful ≥ 3/5); raw second (why: raw 0.50 is ~61 % "free" (always-decline ≈ 0.306)) · date 2026-10-06 · caveat: citation fix (D1 is l.53). Date nuance: decided 10-06 in the audit, applied to the claim draft v3.1 on 10-07 (CRITIQUE-2026-10-16.md:24); floor scale pre-registered as companion 10-02 (analysis-plan.md:22-25)

<!-- lint:exempt:end -->
---

Cite as: r4to, independent researcher. RatLab — A Boar Research (2026), research record 1.0, as of 2026-10-25. Text and data CC BY 4.0. Fact ids or a link must travel with a quote. How to cite: https://r4topunk.github.io/boar-research/cite/ · https://r4topunk.github.io/boar-research/CITATION.cff.

AI-reviewed, not clinically reviewed. Nothing here is medical advice.