# Win-rate reported, never gated (later: proposal to drop the win-rate conjunct because it is saturated at 0)

> Living preprint · as of 2026-10-25 · map node D-065 (decision) · interim record, not a final result.

<!-- lint:exempt:start -->
- [D-065] 2026-10-10 · Win-rate reported, never gated (later: proposal to drop the win-rate conjunct because it is saturated at 0) · why: every phone system scores 0 wins vs a 4.9/5 reference. · status: kept

<!-- lint:exempt:end -->
Read chapter 7, A phone on a desk, and in a hand: https://r4topunk.github.io/boar-research/research/phone.md

## Facts cited {#facts}

Resolve every [F-…] marker in https://r4topunk.github.io/boar-research/data/facts.json. Each line gives the claim, the number with its metric family, set and status, judge, n, seeds, CI, date and caveat.

<!-- lint:exempt:start -->
- [F-753] Win-rate reported, never gated (later: proposal to drop the win-rate conjunct because it is saturated at 0) (why: every phone system scores 0 wins vs a 4.9/5 reference) · date 2026-10-10 (BAR-TABLE); plan 2026-10-02 lists W/T/L as a secondary metric · caveat: the plan never gated on win-rate, but the deep-tier arm reports of 10-08/09 read the bar as 'floor-adj CI low > 0.50 AND win-rate > 0'; 'reported, never gated' was fixed in BAR-TABLE on 10-10 after RND-REVIEW B1. State both

<!-- lint:exempt:end -->
---

Cite as: r4to, independent researcher. RatLab — A Boar Research (2026), research record 1.0, as of 2026-10-25. Text and data CC BY 4.0. Fact ids or a link must travel with a quote. How to cite: https://r4topunk.github.io/boar-research/cite/ · https://r4topunk.github.io/boar-research/CITATION.cff.

AI-reviewed, not clinically reviewed. Nothing here is medical advice.
