Decision ·
Withdraw "facts are not in Wikipedia"; adopt the peer research's task chain
From the record
- Context
- Correction: "facts are not in Wikipedia" withdrawn (scope was the top-100k pack only)
- Why
- peer review showed WIKISECTION covered only one pack and part of the items
- What followed
- WIKIFULL stages run; result 9/34 (a lower bound)
- Reversible
- yes
- Status
- kept
- Alternatives considered
- keep the closure
- build a new corpus right away
Linked facts · 2
- Withdraw "the facts are not in Wikipedia"; no non-Wikipedia corpus build until a gate over all 34 absent V-para items runs (why: WIKISECTION scope covered only top-100k pack and 14/34 items)Withdraw "the facts are not in Wikipedia"; no non-Wikipedia corpus build until a gate over all 34 absent V-para items runs (why: WIKISECTION scope covered only top-100k pack and 14/34 items)Date2026-10-12Kinda record, not a measurement (set, status, judge, n, seeds: not recorded)Caveatoutcome: WIKIFULL gate → MARGINAL (9/34 verified); no WIKI-ALL armSourceresearch record
reports/BAR-TABLE.md:144-145research recordreports/CLOSED.md:69Open the data file - Withdraw "facts are not in Wikipedia"; adopt the peer research's task chain — why: peer review showed WIKISECTION covered only one pack and part of the items — outcome: WIKIFULL stages run; result 9/34 (a lower bound)Withdraw "facts are not in Wikipedia"; adopt the peer research's task chain — why: peer review showed WIKISECTION covered only one pack and part of the items — outcome: WIKIFULL stages run; result 9/34 (a lower bound)Date2026-10-12 14:14Kinda record, not a measurement (set, status, judge, n, seeds: not recorded)CaveatVerification note: Outcome should read "9/34 verified (lower bound, MARGINAL)", not "9/34 (a lower bound)".Sourcenot in the public repositories yetOpen the data file