Concept
deep tier
An optional slower mode that uses a much bigger model which "thinks" before answering; the largest quality gain measured so far, but as of 2026-10-18 it has not run on a phone (a pending run).
From the record
- In technical terms
- Cut 6 + Qwen3.6-35B-A3B UD-Q2_K_XL (≈ 3B active per token) + thinking budget 512: V-para floor-adjusted 0.436 (2 seeds, dev-style, Opus), desktop p50 ≈ 79 s; projected ≈ 1.9–2.8 min on a 12 GB phone.
Linked facts · 2
- Recommended deep configuration (35B mixture-of-experts + 512-token thinking budget) on the bounty-style set.Recommended deep configuration (35B mixture-of-experts + 512-token thinking budget) on the bounty-style set.raw 0.553 (0.524–0.581; with seed noise 0.513–0.592); floor-adjusted 0.436 (0.401–0.472; with seed noise 0.387–0.486); win 0/51; desktop p50 ≈ 79 sSetV-paraStatusdev-styleJudgeClaude Opus (judge.v1, both orders)n51Seeds2Date2026-10-09CaveatChosen as the best of ≥ 8 deep configurations on this same set: expect a winner's-curse discount of about 0.01–0.02. QUEUE prints raw 0.552; the two-seed aggregate is 0.553. Desktop only.Sourceresearch record
reports/BAR-TABLE.md:39research recordreports/BAR-TABLE.md:126research recordREADME.md:28Open the data file - Projected phone time for the recommended deep configuration (never measured on a phone).Projected phone time for the recommended deep configuration (never measured on a phone).≈ 1.9–2.8 min per answer at thinking budget 512 on a 12 GB phone CPU (third-party public decode rates of 4–6 tok/s + BOAR arithmetic); the 2026-10-09 estimate of 3.5–5 min was for budget 1024Date2026-10-12Kinda record, not a measurement (set, status, judge, n, seeds: not recorded)CaveatThird-party rates, not a BOAR measurement.Sourceresearch record
reports/DEEP-RESEARCH-2026-10-12.md:8Open the data file