RatLabA Boar Research
Closed recordas of what’s still open →

Concept

judge family / self-preference

The questions, the reference answers and the judge all came from the same AI company, which may bias the scores.

From the record

In technical terms
Claude wrote v0.2 and V-para items and the references, and judged. Self-preference direction is measured only by one post-hoc cross-family re-judge. v0.3 is to be written outside the Claude family.

Linked facts · 1

  • A judge from a different model family scores everything higher on V-para, but keeps the ranking and the near-zero win-rate.A judge from a different model family scores everything higher on V-para, but keeps the ranking and the near-zero win-rate.4B: raw 0.497 (0.449–0.547), floor-adjusted 0.361; deep + think 512: raw 0.667 (0.621–0.711), floor-adjusted 0.577 (0.519–0.632); deep − 4B +0.171 (+0.123…+0.219) vs +0.139 under Claude; per-item Spearman 0.88–0.92; win-rate 0.00–0.01SetV-paraStatusdev-styleJudgecross-family: OpenAI gpt-5.6-sol (via the Codex CLI) (post-hoc, not pre-registered)n51 (408 judge calls)Seeds2Date2026-10-16CaveatPost-hoc and not pre-registered; it is the only point above 0.50 floor-adjusted on V-para and exists only under the cross-family judge; the lower-judge rule keeps the Claude number as headline.Sourcenot in the public repositories yetOpen the data file