# FACTS-r6: FACTS-r6

> Living preprint · as of 2026-10-25 · map node X-050 (experiment) · interim record, not a final result.

<!-- lint:exempt:start -->
- [X-050] FACTS-r6 · FACTS-r6 · question: Does asset coverage expansion (1,036 -> 4,233 entities) plus 5 trigger fixes on r5 reach >=85% recall on blind set 4 with 0 false positives? · result: recall 70 % < 75 % bar. · set recall-set-4.jsonl (FACTS blind set 4); nearmiss-lc2.jsonl (blind adversarial lowercase); recall sets 1-3 (dev); nearmiss-lc (dev), judge none (deterministic gate), n set 4: 60 (40 fact + 20 near-miss); nearmiss-lc2 40; dev sets 1-3, seeds deterministic · verdict: closed (closed: FAIL on blind set 4 (recall 70 % < 75 %); r6 kept as head by coordinator and shipped in cut 7 via CUT7 (0 fires on v0.2/V-para))

<!-- lint:exempt:end -->
Read chapter 4, Seven frozen builds: https://r4topunk.github.io/boar-research/research/builds.md

## Facts cited {#facts}

Resolve every [F-…] marker in https://r4topunk.github.io/boar-research/data/facts.json. Each line gives the claim, the number with its metric family, set and status, judge, n, seeds, CI, date and caveat.

<!-- lint:exempt:start -->
- [F-421] R9 FACTS instant tier: Wikidata table r1–r6. recall 70 % < 75 % bar · set UNKNOWN (status UNKNOWN) · judge UNKNOWN · n UNKNOWN · seeds UNKNOWN · CI not computed · caveat: why closed: FAIL by frozen rule; shipped by decision

<!-- lint:exempt:end -->
---

Cite as: r4to, independent researcher. RatLab — A Boar Research (2026), research record 1.0, as of 2026-10-25. Text and data CC BY 4.0. Fact ids or a link must travel with a quote. How to cite: https://r4topunk.github.io/boar-research/cite/ · https://r4topunk.github.io/boar-research/CITATION.cff.

AI-reviewed, not clinically reviewed. Nothing here is medical advice.
