# NAMEDSLOT: NAMEDSLOT

> Living preprint · as of 2026-10-25 · map node X-058 (experiment) · interim record, not a final result.

<!-- lint:exempt:start -->
- [X-058] NAMEDSLOT · NAMEDSLOT · question: Does giving a question-named low-share title one lead passage after the first hits (cut 6 + one searchDetailed rule) raise gold recall without disturbing retrieval breadth, vs cut 6 retrieval replay? · result: recall@5 0.333 → 0.410 but changed 15/60 lists (bar ≤ 12) · set v0.1 EN 60, judge none (deterministic gate), n 60 (v0.1 EN; 39 gold items), seeds replay of s44 (deterministic) · verdict: closed (closed (NOT ADOPTED as frozen: G2c breadth gate FAIL 15/60 vs ≤ 12; G3/G4 not run by stop rule))

<!-- lint:exempt:end -->
## Outgoing

- ruled out: [G-cut] cut (frozen build) (retrieval captured only a small part of the gap) → https://r4topunk.github.io/boar-research/map/g-cut.md

Read chapter 4, Seven frozen builds: https://r4topunk.github.io/boar-research/research/builds.md

## Facts cited {#facts}

Resolve every [F-…] marker in https://r4topunk.github.io/boar-research/data/facts.json. Each line gives the claim, the number with its metric family, set and status, judge, n, seeds, CI, date and caveat.

<!-- lint:exempt:start -->
- [F-502] Named-slot retrieval (NAMEDSLOT): one lead passage per named title → 15/60 lists changed (bar 12) (gate FAIL)
- [F-513] R3 Named-slot passage ranking: replay, 0 calls. recall@5 0.333 → 0.410 but changed 15/60 lists (bar ≤ 12) · set UNKNOWN (status UNKNOWN) · judge UNKNOWN · n UNKNOWN · seeds UNKNOWN · CI not computed · caveat: why closed: gate FAIL

<!-- lint:exempt:end -->
---

Cite as: r4to, independent researcher. RatLab — A Boar Research (2026), research record 1.0, as of 2026-10-25. Text and data CC BY 4.0. Fact ids or a link must travel with a quote. How to cite: https://r4topunk.github.io/boar-research/cite/ · https://r4topunk.github.io/boar-research/CITATION.cff.

AI-reviewed, not clinically reviewed. Nothing here is medical advice.