Experiment ·
SEARCHPORT Addendum 2 (ON-NH)
Is the port worth it for non-health questions if health turns keep the old search?
AI-reviewed, not clinically reviewed. Nothing here is medical advice.
From the record
- What was tested
- Search port on except for health turns (ON_NO_HEALTH)
- Result
- MAIN 26 → 40, ST 38 → 62, context 1.07×; S1 ungrounded 6 vs 4 (FAIL); S2 usefulness bar passed (CWS 9 → 15, correct-any 20 → 21, WU 31 → 30 of 51 changed UXMATRIX items)
- Verdict
- adopted: shipped or recommended by its frozen rule
- Detail
- frozen verdict not WORTH-IT (S1 FAIL by the letter); merged as ON_NO_HEALTH under the author's prior condition
- Set
- MAIN 92 keyed; 180 pack self-tests; 65 F3-SAFETY probes (dev); UXMATRIX 60
- Judge
- replay; grounded-dose scorer; Claude Haiku labels (S2)
- n
- 92 + 180 + 65 + 60
- Seeds
- 1 (42)
- Pre-registered
- yes (ADDENDUM-2, frozen 19:2x)
Linked facts · 2
- SEARCHPORT Addendum 2, ON_NO_HEALTH (the port on except on turns the health predicate reads as health): delivery MAIN 26 → 40, own fact chunk 38 → 62, 0 health losses, context 1.07×; S1 (65 probes with follow-up history)…SEARCHPORT Addendum 2, ON_NO_HEALTH (the port on except on turns the health predicate reads as health): delivery MAIN 26 → 40, own fact chunk 38 → 62, 0 health losses, context 1.07×; S1 (65 probes with follow-up history): the port is off on 53, no probe changes its final path (41 fixed text, 23 model, 1 exposure both ways), 10 kept lists change, and ungrounded dose figures rise from 4 to 6 (a temperature on a carbon-monoxide probe, a duration that changed from hours to days, one repeated temperature): S1 FAIL; S2 (UXMATRIX 60, pack on) passed its frozen usefulness bar; frozen verdict: not WORTH-ITMAIN 26 → 40; ST 38 → 62; ungrounded 6 vs 4 (grounded 9 vs 5); S2 bar passedSetMAIN 92 keyed; 180 pack self-tests; 65 F3-SAFETY probes (dev); UXMATRIX 60StatusdevJudgereplay (0 LLM); grounded-dose scorer; Claude Haiku labels for S2 (168 calls)n92 keyed MAIN; 180 self-tests; 65 probes; UXMATRIX 60Seeds1 (42)Date2026-10-24 19:34CaveatS2 bar (frozen): correct-with-source +3 items or more, correct-any not lower by more than 1, wrong-unwarned not higher by more than 1. The S2 counts are BoarLite answer-quality numbers, published by the author's decision of 2026-10-25 (AD-15 (b)). Health content: AI-reviewed, not clinically reviewed. Nothing here is medical advice.Sourcenot in the public repositories yetOpen the data file
- The search port was merged into BoarLite as ON_NO_HEALTH although its frozen criterion failed by the letter (S1: 6 vs 4 ungrounded figures): before the run the author had set a standing condition ('I accept the health lo…The search port was merged into BoarLite as ON_NO_HEALTH although its frozen criterion failed by the letter (S1: 6 vs 4 ungrounded figures): before the run the author had set a standing condition ('I accept the health loss if it is worth it for the rest'), which the S2 result metmerged (mode ON_NO_HEALTH)Date2026-10-24 19:35Kinda record, not a measurement (set, status, judge, n, seeds: not recorded)Caveatwho: coordinator under the author's prior condition; frozen verdict: not WORTH-IT; reversible: yes (one switch). Health content: AI-reviewed, not clinically reviewed. Nothing here is medical advice.Sourcenot in the public repositories yetOpen the data file